login

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

BMJPublished 12 October 2016Open access
Jonathan A C Sterne, Miguel A. Hernán, Barnaby C Reeves, Jelena Savović, Nancy D Berkman, Meera Viswanathan
Citations19,002
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.98
SNIP9.45
View PDF

TL;DR

Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions is developed, a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units or clusters of individuals to comparison groups.

Abstract

Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.

Keywords

Decision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and FinanceHealth Professions